General Guidelines
2.1.1 As a general rule, the banks should confine
themselves to financial guarantees over performance guarantee business.
2.1.2 banks should prefer shorter maturities and
leave longer maturities for other institutions.
2.1.3
No
bank guarantee should normally exceed 10 years. However, it has since been decided to allow banks to also issue
guarantees for periods beyond 10 years keeping in view their Asset Liability
management. Banks may evolve a policy on issuance of guarantees beyond 10 years
with the approval of their Board of Directors.
2.2 Guidelines
relating to conduct of guarantee business
2.2.1 Norms for unsecured advances &
guarantees
(i)
Until
June 17, 2004, 20% of unsecured guarantees plus the total unsecured advances
should not exceed 15% of its total advances. Banks’ Boards have now been given
the freedom to fix their own policies on their unsecured exposures. Exposure
shall include all funded and non-funded exposures. ‘Security’ will mean
tangible security charged to the bank.
(ii) Banks, may however, treat annuities
under build-operate –transfer (BOT) model in respect of road/highway projects
and toll collection rights where there are provisions to compensate the project
sponsor if a certain level of traffic is not achieved, as tangible securities,
subject to the condition that banks’ right to receive annuities and toll
collection rights is legally enforceable and irrevocable.
2.2.2 Precautions for issuing guarantees
Banks should adopt the following precautions
while issuing guarantees on behalf of their customers.
(i)
As a rule, banks should avoid giving unsecured guarantees in large
amounts and for medium and long-term periods. They should avoid undue
concentration of such unsecured guarantee commitments to particular groups of
customers and/or trades.
(ii)
Unsecured guarantees should be limited to a reasonable proportion of the
bank’s total unsecured guarantees. Guarantees on behalf of an individual should
also be of a reasonable proportion to the constituent’s equity.
(iii)
In exceptional cases, banks may give deferred payment guarantees on an
unsecured basis for modest amounts to first class customers who have entered
into deferred payment arrangements in consonance with Government policy.
(iv) Guarantees executed on behalf of any
individual constituent, or a group of constituents, should be subject to the
prescribed exposure norms.
(v)
It is essential to realise that guarantees contain inherent risks and
that it would not be in the bank’s interest or in the public interest, to
encourage parties to over-extend their commitments.
2.2.3 Precautions for averting frauds
While issuing
guarantees on behalf of customers, the following safeguards should be observed
by banks:
(i) At the time of
issuing financial guarantees, banks should be satisfied that the customer would
be in a position to reimburse the bank in case the bank is required to make
payment under the guarantee.
(ii) In the case of
performance guarantee, banks should satisfy themselves that the customer has
the necessary experience, capacity and means to perform the obligations under
the contract.
(ii)
Banks should refrain from issuing
guarantees on behalf of customers who do not enjoy credit facilities with them. However, BG
/LC may be issued by scheduled commercial banks to clients of co-operative
banks against counter guarantee of the
co-operative bank. Further, banks must satisfy themselves that the
concerned co-operative banks have sound credit appraisal and monitoring systems
as well as robust Know Your Customer (KYC) regime.
2.2.4 Ghosh Committee Recommendations
(i) Bank guarantees should be issued in serially numbered security
forms.
(ii) Banks should, caution the
beneficiaries that they should, verify the genuineness of the guarantee with
the issuing bank.
2.2.5 Internal control systems
Bank guarantees issued for Rs.50,000/- and
above should be signed by two officials jointly. A lower cut-off point,
depending upon the size and category of branches, may be prescribed by banks,
where considered necessary. In case, exceptions are made for affixing of only
one signature on the instruments, banks should devise a system for subjecting
such instruments to special scrutiny by the auditors or inspectors at the time
of internal inspection of branches.
2.2.6 Guarantees on behalf of Banks' Directors
2.2.6.1 Certain
facilities which include issue of guarantees, are not regarded as 'loan and
advances' within the meaning of Section 20 of the Act. However in case of
devolvement, the very purpose of Sec 20 would be defeated.
2.2.6.2 In view of
the above, banks should, while extending non-fund based facilities on behalf of
their directors and the companies/firms in which the director is interested,
ensure that:
i. adequate and effective arrangements have
been made to ensure that the commitments would be met out of their own
resources by the party.
ii. the bank will not be called upon to grant
any loan or advance to meet the liability, consequent upon the invocation of the
guarantee.
2.2.7 Bank Guarantee Scheme of Government of
India
2.2.7.1 Under the scheme, it is open to Government
Departments to accept freely guarantees, etc. from all scheduled commercial
banks in lieu of security deposits, etc. by contractors.
2.2.7.2 Banks should adopt the Model Form of Bank Guarantee
Bond. Banks should mention in the guarantee bonds and their correspondence with
the various State Governments, the names of the beneficiary departments and the
purposes for which the guarantees are executed. In regard to the guarantees
furnished by the banks in favour of Government Departments in the name of the
President of India, any correspondence thereon should be exchanged with the
concerned ministries/ departments and not with the President of India. In
respect of guarantees issued in favour of Directorate General of Supplies and
Disposal, the following aspects should be kept in view:
i. The name, designation and code numbers
of the officer signing the guarantees should be incorporated under the
signature of officials.
ii. The beneficiary of the bank guarantee
should obtain the confirmation of the concerned banks about the genuineness of
the guarantee issued by them.
iii. The initial period of
the bank guarantee would be for a period of six months beyond the original
delivery period. Banks may incorporate a suitable clause, providing automatic
extension of the validity period of the guarantee by 6 months, and also obtain
suitable undertaking from the customer at the time of issuing the guarantee to
avoid any possible complication later.
iv. A clause would be incorporated by
DGS&D in the tender forms to the effect that whenever a firm fails to
supply the stores within the delivery period of the contract, the request for
extension for delivery period will automatically be taken as an agreement for getting
the bank guarantee extended. Banks should make similar provisions in the bank
guarantees for automatic extension of the guarantee period.
v. The Public Notice issued by the Customs
Department stipulates, inter alia, that all bank guarantees furnished by an
importer should contain a self-renewal clause inbuilt in the guarantee itself.
As the stipulation in the Notice is akin to the notice in the tender form
floated by the DGS&D, the provision for automatic extension of the
guarantee period in the bank guarantees issued to DGS&D, should also be
made applicable to bank guarantees issued favouring the Customs Houses.
vi. The bank guarantee and extension letters
thereof, would be on non-judicial stamp paper.
2.2.8 Guarantees on behalf of Share and Stock
Brokers/ Commodity Brokers
Banks may issue guarantees on behalf of share
and stock brokers in favour of stock exchanges in lieu of security deposit.
Banks may also issue guarantees in lieu of margin requirements as per stock
exchange regulations. Banks have been advised that they should obtain a minimum
margin of 50 percent while issuing such guarantees. A minimum cash margin of 25
per cent (within the above margin of 50 per cent) should be maintained in
respect of such guarantees issued by banks. The above minimum margin will also
apply to guarantees issued by banks on behalf of commodity brokers in favour of
the national level commodity exchanges, in lieu of margin requirements as per
the commodity exchange regulations. Banks should assess the requirement of each
applicant and observe usual and necessary safeguards including the exposure
ceilings.
2.2.8.1 Irrevocable Payment Commitments – Financial
Guarantees
Banks issuing Irrevocable Payment Commitment
(IPCs) to various Stock Exchange on behalf of Mutual Funds and FIIs are advised
to adopt the following risk mitigation measures:
i.
Only
those custodian banks would be permitted to issue IPCs who have a clause in the
Agreement with their clients which gives them an inalienable right over the
securities to be received as payout in any settlement. However, in cases where
transactions are pre-funded, the requirement of the clause will not be insisted
upon.
2.2.9 Guidelines relating to obtaining of
personal guarantees of directors
and
other managerial personnel of borrowing concerns
2.2.9.1 Personal guarantees of directors
Banks should take personal guarantees of
directors for the credit facilities, etc. granted to corporates, public or
private, only when absolutely warranted and not as a matter of course.
A. Where
guarantees need not be considered necessary
i. Ordinarily, in the case of public limited
companies, when the lending institutions are satisfied about the management, no
personal guarantee need be insisted upon.
ii. Where the lending institutions are not so
convinced about the aspects of loan proposals mentioned above, they should seek
to stipulate conditions to make the proposals acceptable without such
guarantees. (Eg. restrictions on distribution of dividends, further expansion,
aggregate borrowings, creation of further charge on assets, stipulation of
maintenance of minimum net working capital, parity between owned funds and
capital investment and the overall debt-equity ratio.)
B. Where
guarantees may be considered helpful
i. Personal guarantees of directors may be
helpful in respect of companies, where shares are held closely by a person or
connected persons or a group. Where personal guarantee is considered necessary,
the guarantee should preferably be that of the principal members of the group
holding shares in the borrowing company rather than that of the managerial
personnel functioning as director or in any managerial capacity.
ii. Even if a company is not closely held,
there may be justification for a personal guarantee of directors to ensure continuity
of management. Thus, a lending institution could make a loan to a company whose
management is considered good. Subsequently, a different group could acquire
control of the company, which could lead the lending institution to have
well-founded fears that the management has changed for the worse and that the
funds lent to the company are in jeopardy. One way by which lending
institutions could protect themselves in such circumstances is to obtain
guarantees of the directors and thus ensure either the continuity of the
management or that the changes in management take place with their knowledge.
Even where personal guarantees are waived, it may be necessary to obtain an
undertaking from the borrowing company that no change in the management would be
made without the consent of the lending institution. Similarly, during the
formative stages of a company, it may be in the interest of the company, as
well as the lending institution, to obtain guarantees to ensure continuity of
management.
iii. Where companies are not rated as first
class and the advance is on an unsecured basis.
iv. Companies, whose financial position and/or
capacity for cash generation is not satisfactory even though the relevant
advances are secured.
v. Cases where there is likely to be
considerable delay in the creation of a charge on assets, guarantee may be
taken, where deemed necessary, to cover the interim period between the
disbursement of loan and the creation of the charge on assets.
vi. The guarantee of parent companies may be obtained
in the case of subsidiaries whose own financial condition is not considered
satisfactory.
vii. Personal guarantees are relevant where
the balance sheet or financial statement of a company discloses interlocking of
funds between the company and other concerns owned or managed by a group.
C. Worth
of the guarantors, payment of guarantee commission, etc
Where personal guarantees of directors are
warranted, they should bear reasonable proportion to the estimated worth of the
person. Banks should obtain an undertaking from the borrowing company as well
as the guarantors that no consideration would be paid or received. There may,
however, be exceptional cases where payment of remuneration may be permitted
e.g. where assisted concerns are not doing well and the existing guarantors are
no longer connected with the management but continuance of their guarantees is
considered essential because the new management's guarantee is either not
available or is found inadequate and payment of remuneration to guarantors by
way of guarantee commission is allowed.
D. Personal
guarantees in the case of sick units
As the personal
guarantees of promoters/ directors generally instill greater accountability,
banks, may obtain guarantees from directors (excluding the nominee directors)
and other managerial personnel in their individual capacities. In case, for any
reasons, a guarantee is not considered expedient by the bank at the time of
sanctioning the advance, an undertaking should be obtained from the individual
directors that in case the borrowing unit show cash losses or adverse current
ratio or diversion of fund, the directors would be under an obligation to
execute guarantees in their individual capacities, if required by the bank.
Banks may also obtain guarantees at their discretion from the parent/holding
company when credit facilities are extended to borrowing units in the same
Group.
2.2.10 Guarantees of State Government
Banks should obtain guarantees of State
Governments on merits and only in circumstances absolutely necessary, and not
as matter of course.
2.3 Other stipulations – Issuing bid bonds
and performance guarantees for export
(i.) With
a view to boost exports, banks should adopt a flexible approach in the matter
of obtaining cover, while issuing bid bonds and performance guarantees for
export purposes. Banks may, however, safeguard their interests by obtaining an
Export Performance Guarantee of ECGC, wherever considered necessary.
(ii.) ECGC
would provide 90 percent cover for bid bonds, provided the banks give an
undertaking not to insist on cash margins.
(iii.) Where
counter-guarantees of ECGC are not available, the banks may stipulate a
reasonable cash margin only if it is considered absolutely necessary.
(iv.) Banks
may consider sanctioning separate limits for issue of bid bonds. Within the
limits so sanctioned, bid bonds against individual contracts may be issued,
subject to usual considerations.
2.3.1 Unconditional Guarantees in favour of
Overseas Employers/
Importers
on behalf of Indian Exporters
(i.) While
agreeing to give unconditional guarantee in favour of overseas
employers/importers on behalf of Indian Exporters, banks should obtain an
undertaking from the exporter that when the guarantee is invoked, the bank
would make payment, notwithstanding any dispute between the exporter and the
importer.
This is considered desirable as non-honouring
of guarantees on invocation might prompt overseas banks not to accept
guarantees of Indian banks, thus hampering the country's export promotion
effort.
2.3.2 Certain precautions in case of Project
Exports
(i.) Banks
are aware that the Working Group mechanism has been evolved for the purpose of
giving package approvals in principle at post-bid stages for high value
overseas project exports. The role of the Working Group is mainly regulatory in
nature, but the responsibility of project appraisal and that of monitoring the
project lies solely on the sponsor bank.
(ii.) As
the Working Group approvals are based on the recommendations of the sponsor
banks, the latter should examine the project proposals thoroughly with regard
to the capacity of the contractor/ sub-contractors, protective clauses in the
contracts, adequacy of security, credit ratings of the overseas
sub-contractors, if any, etc.
(iii.) Therefore,
a careful assessment of financial and technical demands involved in the
proposals vis-à-vis the capability of the contractors (including
sub-contractors) as well as the overseas employers should be made, in view of
their high values and the possibilities of foreign exchange losses in case of
failure, apart from damage to the image of Indian entrepreneurs.
(iv.) While
bid bonds and performance guarantees cannot be avoided, it is to be considered
whether guarantees should be given by the banks in all cases of overseas
borrowings for financing overseas projects. Appropriate arrangements should
also be made for post-award follow-up and monitoring of the contracts.
2.3.3 Guarantees for Export Advance
(i) Guarantees
are intended to facilitate execution of export contracts by an exporter and not
for other purposes. Banks should ensure that there is no violation of FEMA
regulations.
(ii) Further, banks should also ensure that
the export advances received by the exporters are in compliance with the
regulations/ directions issued under FEMA.
(iii) It is
reiterated that export performance guarantees, shall not contain any clauses
which may in effect allow it to be utilized as financial guarantees/Standby
Letters of Credits
2.3.4 Review of banks’ procedures
Banks may periodically review their position
regarding delegation of powers and procedures, and take action for expediting
decision on export proposals. They may also consider designating a specified
branch, equipped with adequately qualified and trained staff, in each important
centre to deal expeditiously with all export credit proposals at the centre.
2.3.5 Overseas Investment
– Guarantee on behalf of Wholly Owned Subsidiaries (WOSs)/Joint Ventures (JVs)
abroad
(i)
An
Indian party may have financial commitment to its overseas JV / WOS. The
financial commitment may be in the form of
(a)
capital contribution and loan;
(b)
corporate guarantee and / or bank guarantee and
(c)
charge on immovable / movable
property and other financial assets.
Banks, shall not issue
standby letters of credit / guarantees / letter of comforts etc. on behalf of
overseas JV / WOS / Wholly Owned Step Down Subsidiaries (WoSDS) of Indian
companies for the purpose of raising loans / advances of any kind from other
entities except in connection with the ordinary course of overseas business.
Further, while extending such facility, banks should ensure effective
monitoring of the end use of such facilities and its conformity with the business
needs of such entities.
2.4 Restrictions
on guarantees of inter-company deposits/loans
Banks should not execute guarantees covering
inter-company deposits/loans thereby guaranteeing refund of deposits/loans
accepted by NBFC/firms from other NBFC/firms.
2.4.1 Restriction on guarantees for placement
of funds with NBFCs
Guarantees should not be issued for the
purpose of indirectly enabling the placement of deposits/ loans with NBFCs.
2.4.2 Restrictions on Inter-Institutional
Guarantees
2.4.2.1 Guarantees should
not, be issued for the purpose of indirectly enabling the placement of all
types of deposits/loans with non-banking institutions.
2.4.2.3 (a) Banks may issue
guarantees favouring other banks/ FIs/ other lending agencies for the loans
extended by the latter, subject to strict compliance with the following
conditions.
(i) The Board of Directors should reckon the
integrity/ robustness of the bank’s risk management systems and put in place a
well-laid out policy in this regard which would address the following issues:
·
Prudential
limits, linked to bank’s Tier I capital, up to which guarantees favouring other
banks/FIs/other lending agencies may be issued
·
Nature
and extent of security and margins
·
Delegation
of powers
·
Reporting
system
·
Periodical
reviews
(ii) The guarantee shall be extended only to
enable the borrower to avail of additional credit facility from other
banks/FIs/lending agencies.
(iii) The guaranteeing bank should assume a funded
exposure of at least 10% of the exposure guaranteed.
(iv) Banks should not extend guarantees or letters
of comfort in favour of overseas lenders. However, AD banks may also be guided
by the provisions contained in Notification No. FEMA 8/2000-RB dated May 3,
2000.
(v) The guarantee issued by the bank will be an
exposure on the borrowing entity and will attract appropriate risk weight.
(vi) Banks should
ensure compliance with the recommendations of the Ghosh Committee and other
internal requirements relating to issue of guarantees.
(vii) Banks are strictly advised not to provide
guarantees or equivalent commitments for issuance of bonds or debt instruments
of any kind.
2.4.2.3 (b) Lending banks
Banks extending credit facilities against the
guarantees issued by other banks/FIs should ensure strict compliance with the
following conditions:
(i) The exposure assumed by the bank against the
guarantee of another bank/FI will be deemed as an exposure on the guaranteeing
bank/FI and will attract appropriate risk weight.
(ii) Such exposures should be reckoned within the
exposure limits prescribed by the Board of Directors. Since the exposure
assumed by the bank will be for a fairly longer term, the Board of Directors
should fix an appropriate sub-limit for the longer term exposures, since these
exposures attract greater risk.
(iii) Banks should monitor such exposures on a
continuous basis and ensure strict compliance with the prudential norms.
(iv) Banks should comply with the recommendations of
the Ghosh Committee and other internal requirements relating to acceptance of
guarantees of other banks.
2.4.2.4 Exceptions
(i) In regard to rehabilitation of sick/weak
industrial units, in exceptional cases, where
banks are unable to participate in rehabilitation packages on account of
temporary liquidity constraints, the concerned banks could provide guarantees
in favour of the banks which take up their additional share. Such guarantees
will remain extant until such time that the banks providing additional finance
against guarantees are re-compensated.
(ii) In respect of
infrastructure projects, banks may issue guarantees favouring other lending
institutions, provided the bank issuing the guarantee takes a funded share in
the project at least to the extent of 5 percent of the project cost and
undertakes normal credit appraisal, monitoring and follow up of the project.
(iii) In cases Direct
Discounting Scheme for sale of
machinery, the primary credit is provided by the seller’s bank to the seller
through bills drawn on the buyer and the seller’s bank has no access to the
security covered by the transaction which remains with the buyer. As such,
buyer’s banks are permitted to extend guarantee/ co-acceptance facility for the
bills drawn under seller’s line of credit.
(iv) Similarly,
guarantees can be issued in favour of HUDCO/ State Housing Boards and similar
bodies for the loans granted by them to private borrowers who are unable to
offer clear and marketable title to property, provided banks are otherwise
satisfied with the capacity of the borrowers to adequately service such loans.
(v) Banks may issue
guarantees on behalf of their constituents, favouring Development Agencies/
Boards like Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency, National Horticulture
Board, etc., for obtaining soft loans and/or other forms of development
assistance.
2.4.2.5 Infrastructure
projects
Keeping in view the special features of
lending to infrastructure projects, banks have been given discretion in the
matter of issuance of guarantees favouring other lending agencies, subject to
the following conditions:
(i) The bank issuing the guarantee takes a funded
share in the project at least to the extent of 5 percent of the project cost
and undertakes normal credit appraisal, monitoring and follow-up of the
project.
(ii) The guarantor bank has a satisfactory record
in compliance with the prudential regulations, such as, capital adequacy,
credit exposure, norms relating to income recognition, asset classification and
provisioning, etc.
2.5. Payment of invoked guarantees
2.5.1 Where guarantees are invoked, payment
should be made to the beneficiaries without delay and demur on the pretext that
legal advice or approval of higher authorities is being obtained.
2.5.2 Such delays erode
the value of the bank guarantees, the sanctity of the scheme of guarantees, image
of banks and may also lead to unnecessary litigation. In the case of guarantees
in favour of Government departments, this not only delays the revenue
collection efforts but also gives an impression that banks are in collusion
with the parties.
2.5.3 There should be an effective system to
ensure that the persons on whose behalf the guarantees are issued will be in a
position to perform their obligations in the case of performance guarantees and honour their commitments in the case of financial guarantees.
2.5.4 the banks should have a proper
mechanism for making payments in respect of invoked guarantees promptly, so
that no room is given for complaints. When such complaints are made,
particularly by the Government departments, the Chief Executive Officer, should
personally look into it.
2.5.5 When the beneficiary invokes the bank
guarantee and a letter invoking the same is sent in terms of the bank
guarantee, it is obligatory on the bank to make payment to the beneficiary.
2.5.6 As per the
judgement of Supreme court, the commitment of the banks must be honoured, free from
interference by the courts. Except in case of fraud or any case where
irretrievable injustice would be done if bank guarantee is allowed to be
encashed, the court should interfere'.
2.5.7 It is absolutely essential for banks to
appraise the proposals for guarantees with the same diligence, as in the case
of fund based limits, and obtain adequate cover by way of margin so as to
prevent the constituents to develop a tendency of defaulting in payments.
2.5.8 (i) Banks are required to ensure that the
guarantees issued the Government are honoured without delay and hesitation upon
invocation, unless there is a Court order restraining the banks.
(ii) Any
decision not to honour the obligation may be taken, at a fairly senior level
and only in the circumstances where any such payment to the beneficiary would
not be deemed a rightful payment in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the guarantee under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
(iii) Sufficient
powers should be delegated so that delay on account of reference to higher
authorities for payment does not occur.
(iv) For
any non-payment of guarantee in time, staff accountability should be fixed and
stern disciplinary action including award of major penalty such as dismissal,
should be taken against the delinquent officials at all levels.
(v). Where
banks have executed bank guarantees in favour of Customs and Central Excise
authorities to cover differential duty amounts in connection with interim
orders issued by High Courts, the guarantee amount should be released
immediately when they are invoked on vacation of the stay orders by Courts.
2.5.9 (i) Where
the bank is a party to the proceedings initiated by Government for enforcement
of the bank guarantee and the case is decided in favour of the Government by
the Court, banks should not insist on production of certified copy of the
judgement, as the judgement/ order is pronounced in open Court in presence of
the parties/ their counsels and the judgement is known to the bank.
(ii) In
case the bank is not a party to the proceedings, a signed copy of the minutes
of the order certified by the Registrar/ Deputy or Assistant Registrar of the
High Court or the ordinary copy of the judgement/ order of the High Court, duly
attested to be true copy by Government Counsel, should be sufficient for
honouring the obligation under guarantee, unless the guarantor bank decides to
file any appeal against the order of the High Court.
(iii) In
case of any disputes, honouring can be done under protest, if necessary, and
the matters of dispute pursued separately.
(iv) The
Government, on their part, have advised the various Government departments,
etc. that the invocation of guarantees should be done after careful
consideration at a senior-level.
(v) Non-compliance
of the instructions in regard to honouring commitments under invoked guarantees
will be viewed by Reserve Bank very seriously and Reserve Bank will be
constrained to take deterrent action against the banks.
2.6 Co-acceptance of bills
2.6.1 General
·
Banks
co-accept bills of their customers and also discount bills co-accepted by other
banks in a casual manner which ultimately turn out to be accommodation bills.
·
Banks
also discount bills for sizeable amounts, which are co-accepted by certain
Urban Co-operative Banks. On maturity, the bills are not honoured and the
co-operative banks, which co-accept the bills, also find it difficult to make
the payment.
·
Particulars
regarding co-acceptance of bills are not recorded in the bank's books, with the
result that the Head Office becomes aware only when a claim is received from
the discounting bank.
2.6.2 Safeguards
(i) Co-acceptance limits should be
need based and extended only to those customers who enjoy other limits with the
bank.
(ii) Only genuine trade bills
should be co-accepted and the banks should ensure that the goods covered are
actually received in the stock accounts of the borrower.
(iii) The valuation of the goods
should be verified to see that there is no over-valuation of stocks.
(iv) The banks should not extend
their co-acceptance to accommodation bills drawn by group concerns on one
another.
(v) The banks discounting such
bills, co-accepted by other banks, should also ensure that the bills are not
accommodation bills and that the co-accepting bank has the capacity to redeem
the obligation in case of need.
(vi) Bank-wise limits should be
fixed, taking into consideration the size of each bank for discounting bills
co-accepted by other banks, and the relative powers of the officials of the
other banks should be got registered with the discounting banks.
(vii) Care should be taken to see
that the co-acceptance liability of any bank is not disproportionate to its
known resources position.
(viii) A system of obtaining
periodical confirmation of the liability of co-accepting banks in regard to the
outstanding bills should be introduced.
(ix) Proper records of the bills
co-accepted for each customer should be maintained and these should be
scrutinised by Internal Inspectors and commented upon in their reports.
(x) It is also desirable for the
discounting bank to advise the Head Office of the bank, which has co-accepted
the bills, whenever such transactions appear to be disproportionate or large.
(xi) Proper
periodical returns may be prescribed so that the Branch Managers report such co-acceptance commitments entered into by
them to the Controlling Offices.
(xii) Such returns
should also reveal the position of bills that have become overdue, and which
the bank had to meet under the co-acceptance obligation.
(xiii) Co-acceptances
in respect of bills for Rs.10,000/- and above should be signed by two officials
jointly, deviation being allowed only in exceptional cases.
(xiv) Before
discounting/ purchasing bills co-accepted by other banks for Rs. 2 lakh and
above from a single party, the bank should obtain written confirmation of the
concerned Controlling Office of the accepting bank.
(xv) When the value
of total co-accepted bills discounted/ purchased exceeds Rs. 20 lakh for a
single borrower/ group of borrowers, prior approval of the Head Office of the
co-accepting bank must be obtained by the discounting bank in writing.
2.6.2.1 The banks are precluded from co-accepting
bills drawn under Buyers Line of Credit Schemes introduced by IDBI Bank Ltd.
and all India
financial institutions like SIDBI, Power Finance Corporation Ltd. (PFC), NBFCs etc.
2.6.2.2 However, banks may
co-accept bills drawn under the Sellers Line of Credit Schemes (since renamed
as Direct Discounting Scheme) operated by IDBI Bank Ltd.[1]
and all India financial institutions for Bill Discounting operated by IDBI Bank
Ltd.[2]
and all India financial institutions like SIDBI, PFC, etc. without any limit,
subject to the buyer’s capability to pay, and compliance with the exposure
norms prescribed by the bank for individual/ group borrowers.
2.6.2.3 There have been
instances where branches of banks open L/Cs on behalf of their constituents and
also co-accept the bills drawn under such L/Cs. The discounting banks should
first ascertain from the co-accepting banks, the reason for co-acceptance of
bills drawn under their own L/C and only after satisfying themselves of
genuineness of such transactions, they may consider discounting such bills.
2.6.2.4 It would be advisable to determine clear
accountability in case these safeguards are not adhered to and officials found
to be not complying with the instructions must be dealt with sternly.
2.7 Precautions to be taken in the case of
Letter of Credit
2.7.1 Banks should not
extend any non-fund based facilities or additional/ad-hoc credit facilities to
parties or discount bills drawn under LCs, or otherwise, for beneficiaries who
are not their regular clients. In the case of LCs for import of goods, banks
should be very vigilant while making payment to the overseas suppliers on the
basis of shipping documents. The payments should be released to the foreign
parties only after ensuing that the documents are strictly in conformity with
the terms of the LCs.
2.7.2 Settlement of claims
under Letter of Credits
In case the bills drawn under LCs are not
honoured, it would adversely affect the character of LCs and the relative bills
as an accepted means of payment. This could also affect the credibility of the
entire payment mechanism through banks and affect the image of the banks. Banks
should, therefore, honour their commitments under LCs and make payments
promptly.
2.8 Compliance to the regulations of
Foreign Exchange Management Act, 2000
Banks
should note to comply with the directions, regulations issued under Foreign
Exchange Management (Guarantee) Regulations, 2000 as amended from time to time.
I will recommend anyone looking for Business loan to Le_Meridian they helped me with Four Million USD loan to startup my Quilting business and it's was fast When obtaining a loan from them it was surprising at how easy they were to work with. They can finance up to the amount of $500,000,000.000 (Five Hundred Million Dollars) in any region of the world as long as there 1.9% ROI can be guaranteed on the projects.The process was fast and secure. It was definitely a positive experience.Avoid scammers on here and contact Le_Meridian Funding Service On. lfdsloans@lemeridianfds.com / lfdsloans@outlook.com. WhatsApp...+ 19893943740. if you looking for business loan.
ReplyDelete